ive decided i dont like politicians
they are really good at disappointing. the most recent disappointment for me is Abraham Lincoln.
Dare i say it... WORST PRESIDENT EVER
here my beef.
We started out as the united states of america. Lincoln's civil war fundamentally changed the federalist system to being a single state nation with districts.
the reason the constitution had a president was for wartime and to veto unconstitutional bills coming from the legislators. he was not to decide what congress should do. he was to enforce and execute what they had already declared lawful.
The south got no say in the matter of slavery even though they had the representation in congress because they refused the rights of the states. the north forced them to secession, then lincoln was elected and instead of compromising and giving states more power as was originally intended by the founders, he decided to keep as much power for himself- er i mean for the federal government.
i know i know he freed the slaves, but at what cost. There a probably a 1/2 billion other ways to resolve slavery without a war.
i was thinking he could have allowed them to continue slavery but put a tax on crops from plantations with slaves. or give any number of incentives for freeing slaves.
or make school mandatory for slaves and change laws relating to fair treatment of slaves. COMPROMISE talk and work an figure it out don't just start blasting when someone disagrees. We could have advanced the black situation right there like a hundred years but instead he decided to just free them and not address the human aspect.
and now the whole system is a complete mess because the power is so far away from where it is needed.
so to sum up i think the national govn't should make decisions required for the protection of its people's civil liberties and states should control prohibitory law and taxation. National govn't shouldn't even tax for the upkeep of a national militia, but state and civilian militia's. same system of organization underneath the president but funded by the states. because some state in the interior may only need to contribute missle defense or jet construction and maybe a reserve militia and could cost them less than the federal would take.
Dare i say it... WORST PRESIDENT EVER
here my beef.
We started out as the united states of america. Lincoln's civil war fundamentally changed the federalist system to being a single state nation with districts.
the reason the constitution had a president was for wartime and to veto unconstitutional bills coming from the legislators. he was not to decide what congress should do. he was to enforce and execute what they had already declared lawful.
The south got no say in the matter of slavery even though they had the representation in congress because they refused the rights of the states. the north forced them to secession, then lincoln was elected and instead of compromising and giving states more power as was originally intended by the founders, he decided to keep as much power for himself- er i mean for the federal government.
i know i know he freed the slaves, but at what cost. There a probably a 1/2 billion other ways to resolve slavery without a war.
i was thinking he could have allowed them to continue slavery but put a tax on crops from plantations with slaves. or give any number of incentives for freeing slaves.
or make school mandatory for slaves and change laws relating to fair treatment of slaves. COMPROMISE talk and work an figure it out don't just start blasting when someone disagrees. We could have advanced the black situation right there like a hundred years but instead he decided to just free them and not address the human aspect.
and now the whole system is a complete mess because the power is so far away from where it is needed.
so to sum up i think the national govn't should make decisions required for the protection of its people's civil liberties and states should control prohibitory law and taxation. National govn't shouldn't even tax for the upkeep of a national militia, but state and civilian militia's. same system of organization underneath the president but funded by the states. because some state in the interior may only need to contribute missle defense or jet construction and maybe a reserve militia and could cost them less than the federal would take.

is that a sore excuse? maybe.
but it seems to work quite well, and i'm happy with it.